Monday, July 23, 2007

Albo Picking Cherries, Padding Pockets & Screwing the Poor

Tim Craig with The Washington Post hits a triple with his article in today's Washington Post (not quite a homer - criticism at the end). Today's Washington Post points out what Albo Must Go has been saying all along - "abuser fees" will unduly harm the poor. AMG, Del. Albo Creates the $3,550 Speeding Ticket (June 21, 2007) and AMG, Del. Albo Creates and Angry Horde and Pads His Pocket (June 23, 2007).

"I think it is a very destructive piece of legislation that is designed primarily for revenue purposes and is disguised as a highway safety measure," said William C. Buhl, a Circuit Court judge in Van Buren County, Mich. "In my opinion, it increases the dangers on the highways because it creates an enormous, growing pool of unlicensed motorists."

What else does the article say?
  • Tens of thousands suspended because they can't afford the fees;
  • There is little evidence that "abuser fees" improve traffic safety;
  • The Michigan fees were promised to raise $80 to $100 million, but the state has only been able to collect 40% because people can't afford them;
  • Unlicense motorists offenses are increasing and motorists are fleeing police at increased rates because of suspensions;
  • Several judges are taking matters into their own hands and finding people guilty of lesser offenses;
  • Numerous lawmakers, judges, and activists have sought to repeal the fees where enacted;
  • NJ issues about 800,000 "abuser fee" suspensions per year and about 1/4th are unpaid and a 2001 NJ study found that NJ was creating a permanent underclass
  • And this fact: "Under pressure to repeal the fees, [New Jersey] commissioned a study last year that found that although only 16 percent of residents live in low-income areas, those neighborhoods house nearly 40 percent of the people whose licenses have been suspended for failure to pay fees and fines."
  • A Michigan Circuit Court Judge emailed every legislator in the Commonwealth with his concerns about "abuser fees" and no one responded.
  • Henry County Commonwealth's Attorney says state prosecutors are bracing for problems and that the police, the clerks, and the prosecutors weren't consulted - "this is no one was consulted - "is going to have an absolutely ruinous effect on financially challenged Virginians."
So what does Del. Dave Albo have to say about all of this? Get ready:
Virginia Del. David B. Albo (R-Fairfax), who helped develop the state's abusive-driver law, said he was unaware of the study and received only "glowing reports" from New Jersey officials about how the fees have made roads safer there. Albo said he did not remember getting an e-mail from Buhl.
Del. Dave Albo blind to the plight of the poor? Del. Dave Albo not doing his homework? Cherry picking results to justify a policy that sends him more clients??? Shocker huh?

"My job is to fight for my people, my people are wealthy."
- Del. Dave Albo, Washington Post, Jan. 1, 2004

And Check Out:

Finally, one question for the Washington Post - why do you continually refuse to point out the spin of your quotables and mention that contradicts their spin? For example, in this story:
  • Why no mention that Del. Dave Albo is a traffic attorney!
  • When mentioning that Del. Scott Lingamfelter is proposing repeal - why not mention that Del. Scott Lingamfelter co-sponsored abuser fees - twice - and second only to Del. Dave Albo and Del. Tom Rust?!??!?
  • Why no mention of this project's co-sponsor Del. Tom Rust?
Good job overall, but in the interest of presenting a complete picture - print all sides of the story.

Friday, July 20, 2007

Front Royal Says NO MO ALBO

Front Royal has now taken a stand against Del. Dave Albo! It now appears that common sense Virginians are finally learning what it is like to be victimized by Del. Dave Albo's self-dealing.

Abuser Fees Face the Ax in Front Royal
Peggy Fox, 9 News Now (WUSA) -- The angry over Virginia's "abuser fees" have reached a boiling point in Front Royal, Virginia and they're not going to take it anymore.

The town council will vote on a proposal to block the enforcement of the fees withtown limits.

Councilman Tom Sayre who is leading the charge says the fees are too steep and will severely hurt lower income people who are charged with traffic violations.

Springfield Delegate Dave Albo (R) crafted the "abuser fee" plan as part of $1 billion a year transportation package. The fees do not apply to common traffic infractions such as failing to use a signal, but they do target drunk drivers and reckless driving which can be 20 miles per hour over the speed limit.

Albo says the bloggers are fueling misunderstanding.

He says getting rid of the "abuser fees" would cause the whole package to unravel. He says if the plan unravels, Northern Virginians may not see Rolling Road widened or the Fairfax County Parkway finished.

To raise the $60 million the abuser fees would bring would take a 2 cent increase in the gas tax, but Albo and others say that never would've passed the legislature.

The Washington Post Covers It Here

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

The More Albo Changes, The More Albo Stays the Same

Here's a fun tidbit from 1996.

The Washington Post - Albo's Day Job Draws Flak

Thomas Jefferson made him do it. Or so says Springfield lawmaker and lawyer Dave Albo, who has been drumming up business among people who are trying to beat
drunken-driving raps.

You see, the 34-year-old Republican says, Jefferson "created this thing called a citizen legislature." And so, for his part-time job as a state delegate, Albo gets paid only $ 17,640 a year." Which means I have to have a job," he said. Albo, who voted to lower the state's legal blood alcohol limit and helped close loopholes in the drunken-driving law to make it easier to win convictions, said there's nothing wrong with advertising for clients who have been charged with driving under the influence of alcohol. He keeps Statehouse affairs separate from the courthouse, he said. "When someone comes to my office, I give them 100 percent of my effort," he said. "When I go down to the General Assembly to do my job as delegate, I give 100 percent also."

Albo's ad, which ran for several months in Washington's alternative City Paper, was flagged by the Northern Virginia Citizens Defense League, a gun rights group that opposes Albo's stances strengthening gun control. "Why is Dave Albo smiling?" reads a caption on a League World Wide Web page over a smiling photo of Albo and a copy of the ad. The implication is that Albo is benefiting by voting for a lower legal blood alcohol limit even as he profits by defending drunk drivers.

"Here's this hypocrite who says he's tough on crime, yet he goes around working to get drunk drivers off," League executive director Paul Moog said. "Is that public safety?" But Albo, a second-term delegate, dismissed Moog's attacks as the venom of a gun-rights extremist upset. . . . And, Albo said, since the lower blood-alcohol limit took effect in 1994 -- you're driving drunk if the level is .08 percent -- his DUI cases have not soared. In fact, lawyers are scrambling for business, he said.

Albo's Day Job Draws Flak, The Washington Post (Nov, 28, 1996)

So here we are eleven years later with Del. Dave Albo still doing the same thing and still attacking anyone who dares to question his motives. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

WaPo Spins for Albo & Devolites Again

An Open Letter to the Washington Post & Tim Craig:

We at Albo Must Go read your latest front page article regarding "abuser fees" in the July 17, 2007 paper with concern. We recognize that Del. Dave Albo gives your paper lots of quotes. We also recognize that he serves as an off-the record source for much of your Richmond intelligence. After all, there are very few Republicans left in Northern Virginia and you all need someone. We also know that Del. Dave Albo is always good for a beer at your favorite watering hole and he probably knows a few good jokes.

But, we ask why - why must your paper never provide any reporting or analysis of Del. Dave Albo's conduct in its reporting on his activities? When running a stories about his "abuser fees," why do you never mention the #1 complaint against Del. Dave Albo - that he is a traffic attorney looking to pad his pocket? We said the same thing in our June 23, 2007 piece - AMG, Albo Creates An Angry Horde and Pads His Pockets. We've said it repeatedly here:


It's not like Albo Must Go is the only one saying this. Several Republican blogs have complained (AMG, Albo Takes Two to the Jaw From the Right! (June 23, 2007)). Many of the comments on the online Petition point this out and it is one of the issues cited in the Petition itself.
4. The bill's sponsor, Del. David Albo (R- 42nd District) is a partner in a law firm that specializes in traffic court cases and stands to benefit personally from this legislation. This type of conflict of interest should not be tolerated. Click Here For Petition.
Many other articles in Virginia have pointed it out and coupled it with vehement denials from Delegate Dave Albo. On the other hand, your paper mentioned in in brief passing one article buried in the Metro Section and didn't even have a quote from Del. Dave Albo about this.

Del. Dave Albo's conflict of interest on these fees is one of the biggest problems with this legislation and he also has a history of pushing legislation that push more clients to his business. If you read the comments section, many voters view it as corruption whether or not it technically constitutes a conflict of interest under Virginia's current laws.

All of this gives the impression that your paper cares more about protecting its sources and those in power rather than actually reporting the full story about what real people are saying. For example, in the very same story you quote Sen. Devolites-Davis: A Republican who has sent out seven mail pieces in the last 60 days touting her "leadership" pushing this "Transportation Plan" only to be quoted in your paper asking for a special session to repeal a major part of it. Does your paper point out the fact that she was the primary sponsor of this plan in the Virginia Senate? WHY NOT?

Perhaps instead of writing articles giving your local quotables their opportunity to posture - PLEASE TRY TO REPORT THE NEWS - NOT THE SPIN.

Thank you.

The Management At Albo Must Go

Sunday, July 15, 2007

Albo, Plastic Scrotums, Potty Training, and Smith & Wessons

Somehow AMG missed this jem of an exchange with our hero from the Bristol Herald Courier:

I wish I were making this up. It gets worse. It also will cost you $900 – above and beyond normal traffic fines and court costs – if you display any obscene images visible by other motorists. THE VIRGINIA Code defines obscene as anything that appeals to the prurient interest in sex and includes "excretory functions."

Does this mean I no longer can play that potty DVD for my 2-year-old during road trips in our Honda Odyssey? (The DVD player is a lifesaver.) Such videos are excellent potty-training tools. One of ours has a catchy tune: "She is a super dooper pooper ... she can potty with the best ... no more diapers to get in the way ... she is simply the best." THE VIDEO shows little kids making pee-pee and poo-poo. My question now is, will showing it in the minivan land me in deep doo-doo?

This particular law – 46.2-1077.01 for you legal beagles or Internet initiated – does not bode well for several of our Southwest Virginia drivers. Take the owners of the pickup trucks I recently saw parked at the Exit 7 Wal-Mart. Both trucks had plastic testicles hanging from trailer hitches.

TRUST ME, nothing says redneck like a synthetic scrotum dangling from the rear of your Chevy Tahoe. But now it could cost you $900 – all to pay for new roads and maintenance in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads.

"There’s no road fairy," state Delegate David Albo, R-Fairfax, told me in a telephone interview Wednesday. Mr. Albo, whose 13-mile commute routinely takes one hour and 45 minutes in Northern Virginia, was one of the driving forces behind these new
abuser fees.

True enough about the road fairy, but are bald tires and obscene images worth building your transportation budget on? I asked him.

"HAVING BALD tires is how you kill people," Albo shot back. "You might as well go ahead and point a gun at someone."

I don’t know, call me crazy, but given the choice of facing the business end of a Smith & Wesson or a Michelin, I’m taking the tire, tread or not.

J. Todd Foster, Bristol Herald Courier, Virginia Unveils New Ludicrous Rules for the Road (July 1, 2007).


Well said Mr. Foster. Well said.

The People of Virginia Speak: NO MO' ALBO

***UPDATED LIST OF BLOG & MEDIA COVERAGE***
Originally Posted July 26, 2007

SIGN THE PETITION - CLICK HERE

Well, it's official - the People of the Commonwealth of Virginia have now been victimized by the shameless self-dealing of our own Del. Dave Albo. And what did they say? It's still rolling in. Here's a summary:

The One Who Started It All

Albo Must Go Posts

From Democratic Leaning Blogs

From Republican Leaning Blogs

From The MSM

Editorials & Opinion Columns Destroying Albo, et al.
Letters to the Editor
Nils Linsblad, The Washigton Post, Where Is Del. Albo These Days? (July 21, 2007)

Any other blog posts, stories, editorials, or links - fire them here to albomustgo@gmail.com and we will update


And don't forget:

Friday, July 13, 2007

41,000 Angry Voters and Counting

Today, an amazing thing happened. Over 40,000 Virginians signed an online petition demanding the repeal of the Albo & Oblon PLLC Abuser Fee Plan (See AMG, The Albo & Oblon Abuser Fee Plan II (Mar. 24, 2007).
Here are a few of Albo Must Go's favorite comments from the Petition:

It is time we as Americans take our country back. Not only are other countrys using us, our politicians are too.Jennie Dunn, #22

This is outrageous, and a penalty that goes way beyond the seriousness of the infractions. I sincerely doubt that lawyers like Mr. Albo are in need of new revenue streams. It also provides a nice little windfall for the insurance companies doing business in Virginia. If the Commonwealth needs the money, it should step up to the plate, admit it, explain why, and find a fairer and more equitable way of generating the revenue. To slip this past the citizens of the Commonwealth in this fashion is cowardly and irresponsible. I should have thought the Governor and Virginia legislature would have served us better.
William G. Trout #93

Government For the People, not for Profit!
James Eric Henley, #146

The Rich get more rich and the poor get more in debt with this bill.
Chris Barry, #528

Outrageous legislation such as VA3202 has Thomas Jefferson rolling in his grave. It is because of legislation exactly like VA3202 that we revolted against the British 230 years ago. Let us not ever forget that.
Lee Kondor, #562

Who voted these people into office? It is ridiculous.
Bobbi Mount,
#618

Nothing surprises me anymore... another dirtbag politician out for personal gain.
Josh Parman, #655

Stop using the police as tax collectors.
Michael Delaney, #696

These fines especially hurt the poor and young residents of the state who may have trouble even paying the fines.
Jeff Shuster, #736

Let's move this to the "dumbest laws in history" category and get back to normal
Doug Meyer, #830

It is great to know the VA government can justify having a crooked delegate pushing/approving legislation that will line HIS law firm's pockets based on VA populations need to fight these ridiculous fees and penalties. Sad, absolutely SAD.
Justin Bowen, #843

This law is unconstitutional and the lawmakers are lining their own pockets because they know we will be forced to hire more attorneys for a traffic violation.
Curtis M. Fritts, #868

You are all money hungry and incabable of managing a budget. How about really serving the State by not taking a salary for yourselves, just like in the real Democracy of Ancient Greece? That's service, not cronyism.
John Margetis, #876

We poke fun at hick towns that set up speed traps to increase revenue. Our legislators are turning our entire state into a national joke with this "Lawyers' Full Employment Act."
Darryll C. Stone, #896

Is this a communistic state governed by a few rouge politicians or all of them crocked lying dogs who say anything during election year then once elected start on there own private agender to line their pockets with our hard earned cash!
Kenneth B. Hunter, #931

This man represented me for a DUI. He stole almost $5,000 and then told me I'd be stupid not to take a plea bargain that was offered to me. $5,000 and he just sat there and yawned. I took the plea bargain, and now I've been told by numerious lawyers (some of who are personel friends of Mr. Albo) that he screwed me. They could've done much more for half the price. It's kinda funny now since he kept bringing up that I might "hear" some bad press as his delegate race was coming to an end. A complete coward who cares nothing but about himself.
Jason R Peters, #954

Virginia residents are being penalized for making Virginia their home.
Gary Yates, #957

How about raising the minimum wage to be able to atleast pay these ridiculous fines
Laura, #969

to make the people pay for the countys needs is one thing but to put financialy nstable people, which there are a lot of in this expensive county, in terrible situations for something that may have been an accedent is not right. not everone is perfect, people make mistakes and this is a free country. i strongly disagree with this new policy and belive some of the rather wealthy decition makers shoud try put them selves in the shoes of an avrage citizen so they can see how potentaly devistating this poliacy can be to a fragle budget. This obserd law could seriously devestate the people of fairfax county and cause many unnecessary concounces, and hardships that do not have to be, thank you.
tyler masters, #981

Sic Semper Tyrannis!William S. Mitchell, #986

This law makes
me want to vomit!!!Darren Wietz, #1010

THE RICH WILL JUST TAKE THEIR CARS AND REGISTER THEM WHERE HEY AVE ANOTHER HOUSE! THE POOR ARE GOING TO BE THE ONES PAYING OR THE MAJORITY OF THESE CIVIL FEES!!!!
toby diggs, #1022

Un-civil punishment aimed to bankrupt the poor and working class
James Duda, #1025

This legislation is the worst combination of legislative abuse and nanny-state entality from the home of Patrick Henry, who wrote ""Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God!" He was talking directly to YOU.
Noah Teates, #1050


Now that's just the first 1,000 OUT OF 40,000. The People have spoken Delegate Albo.

Saturday, July 07, 2007

Albo's "Transportation Plan" - An Embarassment to Republicans

Delegate Dave Albo proudly brags on his website that he "modernized our transportation system" and that he was the plan's "chief architect." So what do five of his fellow Republicans think? Here are some excerpts from a story in yesterday's Washington Times:
The landmark transportation package that Virginia lawmakers passed in the 2007 General Assembly now appears to be more of a liability than a re-election asset for some, as voters and localities are threatening to deal with the legislation in court. "Not a lot of people are running around town bragging about transportation anymore," said Delegate Jeffrey Frederick, a Prince William County Republican who opposed the agreement that for years split Republican and Democratic lawmakers. "People just have eggs all over their faces."

Corey Stewart, chairman of the Prince William County Board of Supervisors, said increased public scrutiny is good. "For whatever reason it has not gotten the sort of public attention it deserves," said Mr. Stewart, a Republican. "This is a big deal. This is a significant tax increase."

"We don't believe it is constitutional to allow an unelected body to raise taxes on Northern Virginia citizens," said County Supervisor Mick Staton, a Republican. Supervisor Lori Waters, a Republican, said the board thinks members of the authority should be elected so voters can hold them accountable. "I don't feel like I have fair representative as an elected official, even though I voted against the tax increases," Mrs. Waters said.

Though a legal struggle could delay or even kill a series of construction projects, Mr. Stewart thinks the biggest concern is where the money will be spent after 2007. "The problem is once you impose the taxes they are imposed forever, and there is no specific list of projects that are going to be funded starting in 2008," he said.

State Delegate Robert M. Marshall
has for months questioned the constitutionality of the transportation package. "The alienation of responsibility and accountability is woven through the fabric of this legislation," said Mr. Marshall, a Prince William County Republican. . . . "The constitution is very clear that the only people who can raise local taxes are a board of supervisors, city councils or members of a regional government that was elected by the citizens of the jurisdiction to which [the tax] applies," he said.

At the same time, state lawmakers continue to be bombarded with phone calls and e-mails from Virginians angry about the stiff driving-related fines - including $1,050 for speeding 20 or more mph over the limit. . . . "I think the politics of the transportation bill have been turned upside down because of the abuser fee," Mr. Frederick said. He also questioned whether the fees, which are charged only to Virginia drivers, violates the equal protection of law.

What does our hero Delegate David Albo say? "It is a total pile of misinformation." "Some Internet journalist has spread a story that Virginia introduced a $3,500 traffic ticket. . . ."

The truth can be a difficult thing to deal with, huh Delegate?

Thursday, July 05, 2007

Memo to Albo: The Ludicrous and Horrific Truth

The past week has been quite interesting now that the general public has discovered the Del. Dave Albo that we have been blogging about here since April, 2006.

It's no surprise to us here that Del. Dave Albo has no sympathy to the plight of the poor who are victimized by his revenue scheme.

"My job is to fight for my people, my people are wealthy."
- Del. Dave Albo, Washington Post, Jan. 1, 2004

So what was Del. Dave Albo's reaction to criticism that by creating massive fines on traffic offenses that he would make more business for Del. Dave Albo the traffic defense lawyer?

Albo bristles at the notion that the new law was intended to drum up business -- an "utterly ludicrous and horrific allegation that I would use my office for personal benefit." "It's just infuriating to me," Albo says, noting that his firm lost $84,500 in January and February alone while he tended to General Assembly work. Road to Ruin Leads to Better Highways, The Daily Press (July 1, 2007).
Huh? My firm lost $84,500 while I was off drafting bills to ______________, yes Del. Albo?? Um, make traffic offenses a lot worse so that when it's time for Del. Albo to practice law Del. Albo will have more business?

What's his newest talking points - attack the teachers and the bloggers.
“That’s totally ludicrous,” he says, noting that he doesn’t make much money helping clients facing DUI charges. What’s more, “You have teachers sitting in the General Assembly voting on their own raises and no one questions that.” “You have teachers sitting in the General Assembly voting on their own raises and no one questions that.”
- Dave Albo, Quoted At Bacon's Rebellion (July 6, 2007)
"I take great offense to that," Del. Albo said Wednesday, blaming the criticism on democratic bloggers. "No moron in America is hiring Dave Albo for $1,200 to get them out of a $1,000 ticket. You never hear any criticism about teachers sitting in the General Assembly voting themselves a pay increase. They're cuddly. Lawyers are not."
Virginia Rolls Out the $3550 Speeding Ticket (July 5, 2007)
How much of a raise did the teachers get Delegate? $3,000 per year? How much revenue does your entire law firm derive from traffic work and how much extra money will you pocket being the "section leader" (see below)???
Have we ever see this before?

In 2004, what legislator led the charge to massively increase penalties for DUI's? His first name starts with "D," last name "A," he 's a delegate, and his firm has a website - Virginia DUI Lawyer. What does it say?

Our firm's Traffic Law section has experienced lawyers who aggressively defend these serious cases. The section leader, David B. Albo. . . .
- Virginia DUI Lawyer Website.

"You'd be hard-pressed to find a person like Delegate Albo in a citizen legislature who has done more to toughen drunk-driving laws," said Erickson.
- Virginia DUI Lawyer Website

Has Del. Dave Albo heard this complaint before? How about this Letter to the Editor from the 2005 campaign?

FROM the BURKE edition of the Connection
Legislating DUI, Letter to the Editor (August 18, 2005)
To the Editor:
I was troubled by Del. Dave Albo's (R-42) letter ["Open Season," Connection, Aug. 11-17, 2005] denouncing a constituent for daring to question Mr. Albo's circular relationship with drunk-driving.

In an age when citizens distrust government, this hostile treatment of a neighbor concerned about a conflict of interest involving public safety only fuels cynicism. I looked into the matter, and verified that Albo does write DUI legislation. He appoints the judges before whom DUI cases are heard. He then represents drunk-driving defendants before the judges he appointed and uses loopholes in the laws he wrote to get his clients off. Sadly, it does not end there. The alcohol industry is Albo's largest campaign supporter, contributing more than $40,000 this year alone according to publicly available reports (www.vpap.org). One failed Albo alcohol bill: allowing citizens to taste the products at ABC stores before getting in their cars and driving away. On the day Mr. Lindenblad's letter was published, I visited Albo's firm's Web site and saw multiple DUI-related links. This morning when writing this letter, I checked again and the page has been drastically changed to eliminate most references to DUI. The old page can be found at: virginiadui.poweradvocates.com/virginia_dui_defenses.html.

In my research, I also came across a transcript of a court hearing in which Mr. Albo misstates the requirements of his own DUI law to a federal judge to secure a lesser sentence for his client. Thankfully, the judge was not fooled and Mr. Albo was forced to apologize for his misrepresentation. Incredibly, Mr. Albo defends this unseemly
relationship between his private practice and his public stances on drunk-driving by stating that the Founding Fathers, in creating a citizen legislature, intended him to make a living off of his legislating. Absurd. George Washington and George Mason once represented our district in the state legislature. Mr. Albo, respectfully, you are neither.

Alan Salisbury
Lorton

Albo Must Go asks:
Will Albo ever get the message?

Sunday, July 01, 2007

82% Reject Albo Tickets

AOL News did an online poll regarding Del. Dave Albo's "abuser" "fees." Where did the online voting public come out?



Gee, those 283,000 people who voted against it must not have read the part about raiding teacher's retirement. That's usually good for about 50% public support, right?

****UPDATED****

Fox 5 News now has a poll up showing 85% disagree with Del. Dave Albo.
VOTE HERE, EARLY AND OFTEN!


"Abuser" "Fees" (Taxes): Cutting Teachers for Potholes

Well it only took two weeks of bashing, but the truth has finally come out. Del. Dave Albo has been running around telling the press that his "abuser fees" were adopted to make the road safer. Well, we get this bit of honesty from Friday's Virginia-Pilot:

Kaine said legislators might consider expanding the fees to cover out-of-state motorists, but he made no promise to push for such a change. It sounds like a simple fix, but it's not.

The fees are currently treated as civil penalties collected by the Department of Motor Vehicles. If you don't pay the fee, your driver's license could be suspended. The fees would have to be changed to criminal fines in order to collect from out-of-state drivers. Virginia's constitution earmarks all court fines to be spent on school construction and teacher retirement benefits. The bad-driver fees were adopted to generate new money for road maintenance. It would take three years and a voter referendum to amend the constitution.

Del. David Albo, R-Fairfax, said he doubts there will be public support for a constitutional rewrite. The Virginian-Pilot, Virginia Motorists Vent to Kaine About Bad Driver Fees (June 29, 2007).

Many commentators have said that these "abuser fees" will cause judges around the Commonwealth to drop their fines on various offenses in light of the mandatory assessments. What does that mean? Less money for school construction and teacher retirement. In other words, a General Fund raid. Where have we heard this before?
"The bottom line is that NoVa needs at least $300 Million more per year in addition to what has already been proposed, and the existing gas tax will not deliver it. If I was Governor, I would deliver $400-500 Million by cutting spending in our core service areas of government. But I am not Governor. . . ."- Del. Dave Albo In Letter to Constituents - quoted in AMG, Cutting Gang Prevention, Kids & Community College (Peter) to Pay Paul (Apr. 16, 2006).
We all know that Delegate Albo has a great record when it comes to teachers. AMG, Dave Albo vs. the PTA (Apr. 25, 2006). Make sure you tell your child's teacher that they better increase their Roth IRA contribution - looks like their retirement just got raided.